Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:27:53 +0000
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>, "willy@...radead.org"
	<willy@...radead.org>, "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
	"wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>, "21cnbao@...il.com"
	<21cnbao@...il.com>, "ryan.roberts@....com" <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	"shy828301@...il.com" <shy828301@...il.com>, "ziy@...dia.com"
	<ziy@...dia.com>, "ioworker0@...il.com" <ioworker0@...il.com>, Pankaj Raghav
	<p.raghav@...sung.com>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] mm: shmem: add mTHP support for anonymous shmem

On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:17:48PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Commit 19eaf44954df adds multi-size THP (mTHP) for anonymous pages, that
> can allow THP to be configured through the sysfs interface located at
> '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/enabled'.
> 
> However, the anonymous shmem will ignore the anonymous mTHP rule
> configured through the sysfs interface, and can only use the PMD-mapped
> THP, that is not reasonable. Users expect to apply the mTHP rule for
> all anonymous pages, including the anonymous shmem, in order to enjoy
> the benefits of mTHP. For example, lower latency than PMD-mapped THP,
> smaller memory bloat than PMD-mapped THP, contiguous PTEs on ARM architecture
> to reduce TLB miss etc. In addition, the mTHP interfaces can be extended
> to support all shmem/tmpfs scenarios in the future, especially for the
> shmem mmap() case.
> 
> The primary strategy is similar to supporting anonymous mTHP. Introduce
> a new interface '/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepage-XXkb/shmem_enabled',
> which can have almost the same values as the top-level
> '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled', with adding a new
> additional "inherit" option and dropping the testing options 'force' and
> 'deny'. By default all sizes will be set to "never" except PMD size,
> which is set to "inherit". This ensures backward compatibility with the
> anonymous shmem enabled of the top level, meanwhile also allows independent
> control of anonymous shmem enabled for each mTHP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/huge_mm.h |  10 +++
>  mm/shmem.c              | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index fac21548c5de..909cfc67521d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -575,6 +575,16 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>  {
>  	return false;
>  }
> +
> +static inline int highest_order(unsigned long orders)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int next_order(unsigned long *orders, int prev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>  
>  static inline int split_folio_to_list_to_order(struct folio *folio,
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 643ff7516b4d..9a8533482208 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1611,6 +1611,107 @@ static gfp_t limit_gfp_mask(gfp_t huge_gfp, gfp_t limit_gfp)
>  	return result;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +static unsigned long anon_shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,

We want to get mTHP orders as well for tmpfs so, could we make this to work for
both paths? If true, I'd remove the anon prefix.

> +				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> +				bool global_huge)

Why did you rename 'huge' variable to 'global_huge'? We were using 'huge' in
shmem_alloc_and_add_folio() before this commit. I guess it's just odd to me this
var rename without seen any name conflict inside it.

> +{
> +	unsigned long mask = READ_ONCE(huge_anon_shmem_orders_always);
> +	unsigned long within_size_orders = READ_ONCE(huge_anon_shmem_orders_within_size);
> +	unsigned long vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
> +	/*
> +	 * Check all the (large) orders below HPAGE_PMD_ORDER + 1 that
> +	 * are enabled for this vma.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned long orders = BIT(PMD_ORDER + 1) - 1;
> +	loff_t i_size;
> +	int order;
> +

We can start the mm anon path here but we should exclude the ones that do not
apply for tmpfs.

> +	if ((vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) ||
> +	    test_bit(MMF_DISABLE_THP, &vma->vm_mm->flags))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* If the hardware/firmware marked hugepage support disabled. */
> +	if (transparent_hugepage_flags & (1 << TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_UNSUPPORTED))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Following the 'deny' semantics of the top level, force the huge
> +	 * option off from all mounts.
> +	 */
> +	if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only allow inherit orders if the top-level value is 'force', which
> +	 * means non-PMD sized THP can not override 'huge' mount option now.
> +	 */
> +	if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE)
> +		return READ_ONCE(huge_anon_shmem_orders_inherit);
> +
> +	/* Allow mTHP that will be fully within i_size. */
> +	order = highest_order(within_size_orders);
> +	while (within_size_orders) {
> +		index = round_up(index + 1, order);
> +		i_size = round_up(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE);
> +		if (i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT >= index) {
> +			mask |= within_size_orders;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		order = next_order(&within_size_orders, order);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)
> +		mask |= READ_ONCE(huge_anon_shmem_orders_madvise);
> +
> +	if (global_huge)
> +		mask |= READ_ONCE(huge_anon_shmem_orders_inherit);
> +
> +	return orders & mask;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long anon_shmem_suitable_orders(struct inode *inode, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> +					struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> +					unsigned long orders)
> +{
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> +	unsigned long pages;
> +	int order;
> +
> +	orders = thp_vma_suitable_orders(vma, vmf->address, orders);

This won't apply to tmpfs. I'm thinking if we can apply
shmem_mapping_size_order() [1] here for tmpfs path so we have the same suitable
orders for both paths.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/v5acpezkt4ml3j3ufmbgnq5b335envea7xfobvowtaetvbt3an@v3pfkwly5jh2/#t

> +	if (!orders)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Find the highest order that can add into the page cache */
> +	order = highest_order(orders);
> +	while (orders) {
> +		pages = 1UL << order;
> +		index = round_down(index, pages);
> +		if (!xa_find(&mapping->i_pages, &index,
> +			     index + pages - 1, XA_PRESENT))
> +			break;
> +		order = next_order(&orders, order);
> +	}
> +
> +	return orders;
> +}
> +#else
> +static unsigned long anon_shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> +				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> +				bool global_huge)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long anon_shmem_suitable_orders(struct inode *inode, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> +					struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> +					unsigned long orders)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> +
>  static struct folio *shmem_alloc_folio(gfp_t gfp, int order,
>  		struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index)
>  {
> @@ -1625,38 +1726,55 @@ static struct folio *shmem_alloc_folio(gfp_t gfp, int order,
>  	return folio;
>  }
>  
> -static struct folio *shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(gfp_t gfp,
> -		struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> -		struct mm_struct *fault_mm, bool huge)
> +static struct folio *shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> +		gfp_t gfp, struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> +		struct mm_struct *fault_mm, unsigned long orders)
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>  	struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> -	struct folio *folio;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf ? vmf->vma : NULL;
> +	unsigned long suitable_orders = 0;
> +	struct folio *folio = NULL;
>  	long pages;
> -	int error;
> +	int error, order;
>  
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE))
> -		huge = false;
> +		orders = 0;
>  
> -	if (huge) {
> -		pages = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> -		index = round_down(index, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> +	if (orders > 0) {

Can we get rid of this condition if we handle all allowable orders in 'orders'?
Including order-0 and PMD-order. I agree, we do not need the huge flag anymore
since you have handled all cases in shmem_allowable_huge_orders().

> +		if (vma && vma_is_anon_shmem(vma)) {
> +			suitable_orders = anon_shmem_suitable_orders(inode, vmf,
> +							mapping, index, orders);
> +		} else if (orders & BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)) {
> +			pages = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> +			suitable_orders = BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +			index = round_down(index, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Check for conflict before waiting on a huge allocation.
> -		 * Conflict might be that a huge page has just been allocated
> -		 * and added to page cache by a racing thread, or that there
> -		 * is already at least one small page in the huge extent.
> -		 * Be careful to retry when appropriate, but not forever!
> -		 * Elsewhere -EEXIST would be the right code, but not here.
> -		 */
> -		if (xa_find(&mapping->i_pages, &index,
> -				index + HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1, XA_PRESENT))
> -			return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
> +			/*
> +			 * Check for conflict before waiting on a huge allocation.
> +			 * Conflict might be that a huge page has just been allocated
> +			 * and added to page cache by a racing thread, or that there
> +			 * is already at least one small page in the huge extent.
> +			 * Be careful to retry when appropriate, but not forever!
> +			 * Elsewhere -EEXIST would be the right code, but not here.
> +			 */
> +			if (xa_find(&mapping->i_pages, &index,
> +				    index + HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1, XA_PRESENT))
> +				return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
> +		}
>  
> -		folio = shmem_alloc_folio(gfp, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, info, index);
> -		if (!folio && pages == HPAGE_PMD_NR)
> -			count_vm_event(THP_FILE_FALLBACK);
> +		order = highest_order(suitable_orders);
> +		while (suitable_orders) {
> +			pages = 1UL << order;
> +			index = round_down(index, pages);
> +			folio = shmem_alloc_folio(gfp, order, info, index);
> +			if (folio)
> +				goto allocated;
> +
> +			if (pages == HPAGE_PMD_NR)
> +				count_vm_event(THP_FILE_FALLBACK);
> +			order = next_order(&suitable_orders, order);
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		pages = 1;
>  		folio = shmem_alloc_folio(gfp, 0, info, index);
> @@ -1664,6 +1782,7 @@ static struct folio *shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(gfp_t gfp,
>  	if (!folio)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> +allocated:
>  	__folio_set_locked(folio);
>  	__folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
>  
> @@ -1958,7 +2077,8 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>  	struct mm_struct *fault_mm;
>  	struct folio *folio;
>  	int error;
> -	bool alloced;
> +	bool alloced, huge;
> +	unsigned long orders = 0;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!shmem_mapping(inode->i_mapping)))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2030,14 +2150,21 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (shmem_is_huge(inode, index, false, fault_mm,
> -			  vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0)) {
> +	huge = shmem_is_huge(inode, index, false, fault_mm,
> +			     vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0);
> +	/* Find hugepage orders that are allowed for anonymous shmem. */
> +	if (vma && vma_is_anon_shmem(vma))

I guess we do not want to check the anon path here either (in case you agree to
merge this with tmpfs path).

> +		orders = anon_shmem_allowable_huge_orders(inode, vma, index, huge);
> +	else if (huge)
> +		orders = BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);

Why not handling this case inside allowable_huge_orders()?

> +
> +	if (orders > 0) {

Does it make sense to handle these case anymore? Before, we had the huge
path and order-0. If we handle all cases in allowable_orders() perhaps we can
simplify this.

>  		gfp_t huge_gfp;
>  
>  		huge_gfp = vma_thp_gfp_mask(vma);

We are also setting this flag regardless of the final order. Meaning that
suitable_orders() might return order-0 and yet we keep the huge gfp flag. Is
that right?

>  		huge_gfp = limit_gfp_mask(huge_gfp, gfp);
> -		folio = shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(huge_gfp,
> -				inode, index, fault_mm, true);
> +		folio = shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(vmf, huge_gfp,
> +				inode, index, fault_mm, orders);
>  		if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
>  			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
>  				count_vm_event(THP_FILE_ALLOC);
> @@ -2047,7 +2174,7 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>  			goto repeat;
>  	}
>  
> -	folio = shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(gfp, inode, index, fault_mm, false);
> +	folio = shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(vmf, gfp, inode, index, fault_mm, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
>  		error = PTR_ERR(folio);
>  		if (error == -EEXIST)
> @@ -2058,7 +2185,7 @@ static int shmem_get_folio_gfp(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>  
>  alloced:
>  	alloced = true;
> -	if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio) &&
> +	if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
>  	    DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(inode), PAGE_SIZE) <
>  					folio_next_index(folio) - 1) {
>  		struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists