[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e730c786-86b9-4362-986d-cfe37ef33753@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:51:39 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
<nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
On 6/10/2024 2:05 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:06:49AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 07/06/24 18:02, Jeff Johnson ha scritto:
>>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> index 19a87873ad60..0b5d68a90e83 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
>>> @@ -395,4 +395,5 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_mediatek_driver = {
>>> module_platform_driver(pwm_mediatek_driver);
>>> MODULE_AUTHOR("John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>");
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek Pulse Width Modulator driver");
>>
>> MediaTek SoCs have got two different PWM IPs, one of which is used exclusively
>> for the Display PWM, and it is located in the DDP block.
>>
>> So, there are two PWM IPs in one SoC:
>> - A general purpose PWM IP
>> - A DDP PWM IP
>>
>> This driver is for the general purpose PWM IP.. so, please, can we change this
>> to "MediaTek general purpose Pulse Width Modulator driver"?
>>
>> After which,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> Looks like a reasonable request.
>
> @Jeff: Can you please resend with the suggested change, I dropped the
> patch from for-next now.
No problem, v2 sent.
/jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists