linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dt-bindings: mmc: Convert fsl-esdhc.txt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a5144e3-aad6-4a1e-ab9f-4c879b050d45@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:44:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dt-bindings: mmc: Convert fsl-esdhc.txt to yaml

On 10/06/2024 16:33, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 02:29:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/06/2024 08:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2024 20:50, Frank Li wrote:
>>>> Convert layerscape fsl-esdhc binding doc from txt to yaml format.
>>>>
>>>> Addtional change during convert:
>>>> - Deprecate "sdhci,wp-inverted", "sdhci,1-bit-only".
>>>> - Add "reg" and "interrupts" property.
>>>> - Change example "sdhci@...00" to "mmc@...00".
>>>> - Compatible string require fsl,<chip>-esdhc followed by fsl,esdhc to match
>>>> most existed dts file.
>>>> - Set clock-frequency to 100mhz in example.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Or not... are you sure that DTS validates? Did you test it? kbuild has a
>> bit different opinion.
> 
> Need additional patch to fix this DTS warnings. It needs convert to yaml
> firstly. If you like, I can create big patch set to fix all emmc related
> warnings.

We kind of been here... I raise the problem and you answer with
something unspecific requiring me to dig more to prove my point. I am
not going to play more of that game.

Did you analyze the errors?

Best regards,
Krzysztof