lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240611081124.18170-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 04:11:23 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Sprinkle __must_check

From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>

The TDP MMU function __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic uses a cmpxchg64 to replace
the SPTE value and returns -EBUSY on failure.  The caller must check the
return value and retry.  Add __must_check to it, as well as to two more
functions that forward the return value of __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic to
their caller.

Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <8f7d5a1b241bf5351eaab828d1a1efe5c17699ca.1705965635.git.isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 36539c1b36cd..effb70f7dcba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
 		kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
 }
 
-static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
+static inline int __must_check __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter,
+							 u64 new_spte)
 {
 	u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
 
@@ -572,9 +573,9 @@ static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
  *            no side-effects other than setting iter->old_spte to the last
  *            known value of the spte.
  */
-static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct tdp_iter *iter,
-					  u64 new_spte)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+						       struct tdp_iter *iter,
+						       u64 new_spte)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -590,8 +591,8 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
-					  struct tdp_iter *iter)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+						       struct tdp_iter *iter)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ