linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: lantiq,gswip: convert to YAML schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74a190bff162feb209636748af14e5ce@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:17:59 +0200
From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: hauke@...ke-m.de, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, andrew@...n.ch,
 davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 olteanv@...il.com, martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 01/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: lantiq,gswip:
 convert to YAML schema

On 2024-06-11 14:51, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:40:15 +0200, Martin Schiller wrote:
>> Convert the lantiq,gswip bindings to YAML format.
>> 
>> Also add this new file to the MAINTAINERS file.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml        | 195 
>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt         | 146 -------------
>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>>  3 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml
>>  delete mode 100644 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq-gswip.txt
>> 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.example.dtb:
> switch@...8000: ports:port@6: 'phy-mode' is a required property
> 	from schema $id: 
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml#
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.example.dtb:
> switch@...8000: ports:port@6: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
> fixed:
> 	'fixed-link' is a required property
> 	'phy-handle' is a required property
> 	'managed' is a required property
> 	from schema $id: 
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml#
> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.example.dtb:
> switch@...8000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('dsa,member',
> 'ports' were unexpected)
> 	from schema $id: 
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/dsa/lantiq,gswip.yaml#
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240611114027.3136405-2-ms@dev.tdt.de
> 
> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different 
> dependency
> should be noted in *this* patch.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. 
> Note
> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up 
> checking
> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your 
> schema.

I have already run 'make dt_binding_check' and got no errors. However, I
then moved the components that are now being criticized to a separate
patch. These are exactly the properties that the original patch would
have added in the example.

I have currently put the conversion to the YAML schema in a separate
patch before adding these properties to preserve the original patch.

Should I combine both changes into one patch instead?