linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtla/osnoise: Better report when histogram is empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>, 
    Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, 
    linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtla/osnoise: Better report when histogram is empty



On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:

> When osnoise hist does not observe any samples above the threshold,
> no entries are recorded and the final report shows empty entries
> for the usual statistics (count, min, max, avg):
> 
>     [~]# osnoise hist -d 5s -T 500
>     # RTLA osnoise histogram
>     # Time unit is microseconds (us)
>     # Duration:   0 00:00:05
>     Index
>     over: 
>     count:
>     min:  
>     avg:  
>     max:  
> 
> That could lead users to confusing interpretations of the results.
> 
> A simple solution is to report 0 for count and the statistics, making it
> clear that no noise (above the defined threshold) was observed:
> 
>     [~]# osnoise hist -d 5s -T 500
>     # RTLA osnoise histogram
>     # Time unit is microseconds (us)
>     # Duration:   0 00:00:05
>     Index
>     over: 0
>     count: 0
>     min: 0
>     avg: 0
>     max: 0
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c
> index 7be17d09f7e85..214e2c93fde01 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c
> +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ osnoise_print_stats(struct osnoise_hist_params *params, struct osnoise_tool *too
>  {
>  	struct osnoise_hist_data *data = tool->data;
>  	struct trace_instance *trace = &tool->trace;
> +	int has_samples = 0;
>  	int bucket, cpu;
>  	int total;
>  
> @@ -402,11 +403,25 @@ osnoise_print_stats(struct osnoise_hist_params *params, struct osnoise_tool *too
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		/* There are samples above the threshold */
IMHO The comment isn't needed because the variable had_samples is 
descriptive, but it's not a big deal either


> +		has_samples = 1;
>  		trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
>  		trace_seq_do_printf(trace->seq);
>  		trace_seq_reset(trace->seq);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If no samples were recorded, skip calculations, print zeroed statistics
> +	 * and return.
> +	 */
> +	if (!has_samples) {
> +		trace_seq_reset(trace->seq);
> +		trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "over: 0\ncount: 0\nmin: 0\navg: 0\nmax: 0\n");
> +		trace_seq_do_printf(trace->seq);
> +		trace_seq_reset(trace->seq);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!params->no_index)
>  		trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "over: ");
>  
> 
> 
> 


Reviewed-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>