[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d36de70b-3052-71eb-fdb4-c09256ff3b96@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:20:31 +0800
From: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: use local_pci_probe when best selected cpu is
offline
Hi Markus,
Thanks for your review.
On 2024/6/13 上午2:08, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
>> This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are offline
>> (we can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it), Therefore,
>> in this case, we should call local_pci_probe() instead of work_on_cpu().
>
> * Please take text layout concerns a bit better into account also according to
> the usage of paragraphs.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc3/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#L128OK, Let rewrite the commit message.
> * Please improve the change description with an imperative wording.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc3#n94
OK, Let me use imperative word.
> * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
OK, Let me add Fixes.
> * How do you think about to specify the name of the affected function
> in the summary phrase?
OK, Let me add the affected function in summary phrase.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
--
Best Regards
Hongchen Zhang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists