[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240612192141.69896438b5f6e674e07d418e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:21:41 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patch):
>
> 08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> This is commit
>
> d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.
That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.
Also,
hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l
22
hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l
1211
Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
let's be a bit more organized about it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists