[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240613-verbogen-daneben-84c61797c60a@brauner>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 07:21:41PM GMT, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > commits (but the same patch):
> >
> > 08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> >
> > in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.
>
> That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.
>
> Also,
>
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l
> 22
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l
> 1211
>
> Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> let's be a bit more organized about it?
Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists