linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] EDAC/bluefield: fix white space in bluefield_edac_mc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:06:38 +0000
From: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "james.morse@....com"
	<james.morse@....com>, "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"rric@...nel.org" <rric@...nel.org>, Shravan Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] EDAC/bluefield: fix white space in
 bluefield_edac_mc_probe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 4:01 PM
> To: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
> Cc: tony.luck@...el.com; james.morse@....com; mchehab@...nel.org;
> rric@...nel.org; Shravan Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>; linux-
> edac@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] EDAC/bluefield: fix white space in
> bluefield_edac_mc_probe
> 
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 03:38:30PM -0400, David Thompson wrote:
> > This patch removes an empty line in bluefield_edac_mc_probe().
> 
> Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is
> tautologically useless.
> 
> Also, do
> 
> $ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process
> 
> for more details.
> 

I did review this section of the kernel documentation and then
went on to create a v2 with the updated commit message.
I apologize but I didn't notice your comment below about 
your preference to not have this type of patch at all.  I have been
told in the past to have separate patches for style cleanups, and
not to bundle them with features.  But I can do as you recommend
for next version.  I will squash the two style fixes into a patch that
contains some new functionality for the BlueField EDAC driver.

> Also, feel free to peruse that whole directory.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c
> > b/drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c index 5b3164560648..1f6f39a7dbf3
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c
> > @@ -320,7 +320,6 @@ static int bluefield_edac_mc_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  	edac_mc_free(mci);
> >
> >  	return ret;
> > -
> >  }
> >
> >  static void bluefield_edac_mc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > --
> 
> So just the effort to create a whole patch just for that is an overkill.
> 
> Please do not do that. If you notice very minor style issues like that, you can do
> them when touching this code as part of a change with more substance. Or you
> can simply ignore such minor issues.
> 
> Whitespace cleanup like that gets in the way of real work and pretty much all
> maintainers are overworked already.
> 
> So I'd appreciate it if you concentrate on real fixes and improvements.
> 
> Thx.
> 
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette