[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a440cbf7-c6d5-4286-a69f-05e668522931@moroto.mountain>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:58:40 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Umang Jain <umang.jain@...asonboard.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org>,
detule <ogjoneski@...il.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: vchiq_arm: Fix initialisation
check
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:41:45PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> ---
> .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 4 ++--
> .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 5 +++++
> .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c | 7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index 54467be8c371..67d853f5f2a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ int vchiq_initialise(struct vchiq_state *state, struct vchiq_instance **instance
> * block forever.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < VCHIQ_INIT_RETRIES; i++) {
> - if (state)
> + if (vchiq_remote_initialised(state))
> break;
> usleep_range(500, 600);
> }
:/ In the original code, this would either break on the first iteration
or fail. The diff looked like this:
for (i = 0; i < VCHIQ_INIT_RETRIES; i++) {
- state = vchiq_get_state();
if (state)
break;
I feel bad for not spotting this. A static checker which looked at
diffs could have made this work, but all of our tools look at a momement
in time instead of looking at the change over time.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists