[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ce15b81-a8bd-4833-b15e-3e6f240dcf03@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:12:27 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...dex.com>,
Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@...il.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
heiko@...ech.de, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com, andy.yan@...k-chips.com
Cc: linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip-emmc-phy: Convert to
dtschema
On 13/06/2024 11:44, Johan Jonker wrote:
>> ---
>
> Add ack request from phy maintainer here.
Why? What do you mean for that? Why phy maintainer needs to ack patches
he is going to take?
>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - fix `reg` in example being too long
>>
>> Tested against `rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dtb`, `rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dtb`
>> and `rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dtb`.
>>
>> .../bindings/phy/rockchip,emmc-phy.yaml | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../bindings/phy/rockchip-emmc-phy.txt | 43 ----------
>> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,emmc-phy.yaml
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-emmc-phy.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,emmc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,emmc-phy.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..85d74b343991
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,emmc-phy.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>
> You are converting an existing document, so GPL 2 only.
Which copyrightable part was copied? This comment is not correct in
general, because conversions are dual-licensed (there are exceptions,
but that's the generic rule).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists