linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] cleanups, fixes, and progress towards avoiding "make headers"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b41f3392-fd0e-4df7-8e29-754def75376b@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:42:31 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...gle.com>,
 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
 "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cleanups, fixes, and progress towards avoiding "make
 headers"

On 13.06.24 23:27, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 6/12/24 7:11 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 6/12/24 1:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 11.06.24 22:54, John Hubbard wrote:
>>>> On 6/11/24 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> On 08.06.24 04:10, John Hubbard wrote:
> ...
>>>> You remembered correctly, but the situation is slighly muddier than
>>>> one would prefer. :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Absolutely, and I appreciate that you are trying to improve the situation.
>>>
>>
>> I think the attempts to further tease apart the include headers could
>> go into a separate, subsequent series, yes? And let this one go in
>> unmolested for now?
>    
> 
> On second thought, it is actually much easier than I thought, let me
> post a v2 with the unistd.h header fixes, after all.

Great! :)

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb