[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f75635d8-4199-4bbe-9fba-a1d2ed206966@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 13:43:08 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp108: document V+ supply, add
short description
On 6/16/24 12:40, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> TMP108 is powered by its V+ supply, document it.
> While at it, add a short description with a link to its datasheets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
> ---
> Not entirely sure of the "v+-supply" name, but the datasheet only ever
> refers to it as "V+" or simply as the "supply voltage".
> Only other name I've seen is in the schematic for the msm8226-based
> motorola-falcon smartphone, where it's called "V_POS".
>
Guess one has to praise the ability of datasheet writers to come up
with different names.
The datasheet for tmp117 also uses the V+ term, yet the supply name
is "vcc-supply". I would personally very much prefer to stick with that,
but that is just my personal opinion.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists