[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zm/FF2xX/rhwmLZ6@standask-GA-A55M-S2HP>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:09:43 +0200
From: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp108: document V+ supply, add
short description
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 01:43:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/16/24 12:40, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> > TMP108 is powered by its V+ supply, document it.
> > While at it, add a short description with a link to its datasheets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Not entirely sure of the "v+-supply" name, but the datasheet only ever
> > refers to it as "V+" or simply as the "supply voltage".
> > Only other name I've seen is in the schematic for the msm8226-based
> > motorola-falcon smartphone, where it's called "V_POS".
> >
>
> Guess one has to praise the ability of datasheet writers to come up
> with different names.
>
> The datasheet for tmp117 also uses the V+ term, yet the supply name
> is "vcc-supply". I would personally very much prefer to stick with that,
> but that is just my personal opinion.
>
> Guenter
>
I'm okay with that. I'll keep this for a few days to see if anyone else
has anything to say, then I'll send a V2 with it changed to vcc.
Stanislav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists