linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp108: document V+ supply, add short description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:16:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: ti,tmp108: document V+ supply, add
 short description

On 17/06/2024 07:09, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 01:43:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 6/16/24 12:40, Stanislav Jakubek wrote:
>>> TMP108 is powered by its V+ supply, document it.
>>> While at it, add a short description with a link to its datasheets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Not entirely sure of the "v+-supply" name, but the datasheet only ever
>>> refers to it as "V+" or simply as the "supply voltage".
>>> Only other name I've seen is in the schematic for the msm8226-based
>>> motorola-falcon smartphone, where it's called "V_POS".
>>>
>>
>> Guess one has to praise the ability of datasheet writers to come up
>> with different names.
>>
>> The datasheet for tmp117 also uses the V+ term, yet the supply name
>> is "vcc-supply". I would personally very much prefer to stick with that,
>> but that is just my personal opinion.
>>
>> Guenter
>>
> 
> I'm okay with that. I'll keep this for a few days to see if anyone else
> has anything to say, then I'll send a V2 with it changed to vcc.

vcc. Anyway + is not an expected character.

Best regards,
Krzysztof