[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnB1FPw3Eg8-61mL@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:40:36 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: arm64: Making BT Field in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1
writable
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:51:29AM -0400, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> In this patch series, we try to make more register fields writable like
> ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.BT since this can benifit the migration between some of the
> machines which have different BT values.
>
> Changelog:
> ----------
> RFCv1 -> v1:
> * Fix the compilation error.
> * Delete the machine specific information and make the description more
> generable.
Can you please address Marc's feedback?
If we only make things writable a field at a time it's going to take
forever to catch up w/ the architecture.
https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/86zfrpjkt6.wl-maz@kernel.org/
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists