linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: microchip: Constify struct vcap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240617185026.lgpspvyjsygh4lry@DEN-DL-M70577>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:50:26 +0000
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
CC: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, "Steen
 Hegelund" <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: microchip: Constify struct vcap_operations

> "struct vcap_operations" are not modified in these drivers.
> 
> Constifying this structure moves some data to a read-only section, so
> increase overall security.
> 
> In order to do it, "struct vcap_control" also needs to be adjusted to this
> new const qualifier.
> 
> As an example, on a x86_64, with allmodconfig:
> Before:
> ======
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   15176    1094      16   16286    3f9e drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.o
> 
> After:
> =====
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   15268     998      16   16282    3f9a drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.o
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> I hope this can be applied as a single patch.
> I think it can be split between lan966x, sparx5 and vcap if really needed.
> ---

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>