[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2946d8a-1ead-4514-b1a4-9c04e37cd8a8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:00:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ
numbers
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> So 0 is invalid. Question is: is it also valid to pass -ve errors, or is
> 0 the _only_ invalid value?
Negative values should be fine.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists