linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7032b425-c2e3-4258-92f9-8035b354ea8b@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:06:01 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Simon Trimmer <simont@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ
 numbers

On 18/06/2024 17:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:54:04PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
>> So 0 is invalid. Question is: is it also valid to pass -ve errors, or is
>> 0 the _only_ invalid value?
> 
> Negative values should be fine.
In that case this patch is necessary so we reject negative values
as not an IRQ. Otherwise we'll try to request a non-existant IRQ and
fail with an error.