lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:07:28 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...nel.org>, Mark
 Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Julien Panis
 <jpanis@...libre.com>, Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...nel.org>
writes:

> Il 18/06/24 12:03, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
>> Il 18/06/24 09:49, Julien Panis ha scritto:
>>> On 6/17/24 18:44, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After merging the mediatek tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>>>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>>>
>>>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-wolfvision-pf5-display.dtsi:113.6-121.3: Warning (graph_port): /fragment@..._overlay__: graph port node name should be 'port'
>>>> Error: /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi:2399.29-30 
>>>> syntax error
>>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>>> make[4]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.lib:431: 
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-magneton-sku393216.dtb] Error 1
>>>>
>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>
>>>>    d7c1bde38bf37a5 ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8186: add default thermal zones")
>>>>
>>>> I have used the last version of the mediatek tree from 20240613 instead.
>>>
>>> Hello Mark,
>>>
>>> Here is the explanation:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/71d53ff6-fdae-440d-b60d-3ae6f0c881d9@baylibre.com/
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6d9e0f19-9851-4f23-a8b8-6acc82ae7a3d@baylibre.com/
>>>
>>> For some reason, the 2 first commits of the series were not applied
>>> with the dts. These commits are needed because they contain some
>>> definitions used by the dts.
>>>
>>> Julien
>> 
>> I'm not sure how should I proceed here.
>> 
>
> Reiterating, I'm sure how should I proceed.

You applied the dts patches but not the bindings, resulting in something
that doesn't build because of changes to #defines in the bindings.

Both of the bindings patches have already been acked by a DT maintainer
(Connor), so you should just apply the bindings along with the DT patches.

> I'm removing those patches from mediatek for-next until further notice.

Rather than remove the DT patches, you should just apply the bindings
patches.

Kevin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ