linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5b5e30b-9f9c-44af-9598-3f878ba01d23@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:42:50 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...nel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mediatek tree

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Julien Panis wrote:

> Just for my information: Should we just wait for another maintainer
> to pick the 2 missing patches ? Who is in charge of doing it ?

In general this is something the relevant maintainers should coordinate
between themselves.  Generally things tend to work better if everything
goes through the same tree so you don't get bisection issues.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)