linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next:master] [perf test] 658a8805cb: perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:34:28 -0400
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, 
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [perf test] 658a8805cb: perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 3:54 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail" on:
>
> commit: 658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e50012e3d1ed5e3 ("perf test: Speed up test case 70 annotate basic tests")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>
> [test failed on linux-next/master 6906a84c482f098d31486df8dc98cead21cce2d0]
>
> in testcase: perf-sanity-tests
> version:
> with following parameters:
>
>         perf_compiler: gcc
>
>
>
> compiler: gcc-13
> test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (Skylake) with 32G memory
>
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>
>
> we didn't observed the issue on parent.
>
> f5803651b4a4b67d 658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e5
> ---------------- ---------------------------
>        fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
>            |             |             |
>            :6          100%           6:6     perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail

Hmm.. strange.  The only change in the commit is to save
the output of perf annotate into a file.  I'm not sure if it'd affect
the test result.  Maybe because of sanitizers..?

Thanks,
Namhyung

>
>
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202406181535.eacba363-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
> 2024-06-14 20:09:34 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e50012e3d1ed5e3/tools/perf/perf test 76
>  76: perf annotate basic tests                                       : FAILED!
> 2024-06-14 20:12:46 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e50012e3d1ed5e3/tools/perf/perf test 77
>  77: Add 'perf probe's, list and remove them                         : Ok
> 2024-06-14 20:12:46 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e50012e3d1ed5e3/tools/perf/perf test 78
>  78: build id cache operations                                       : Ok
>
>
>
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240618/202406181535.eacba363-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>