lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78ded683-9bf8-4f2d-9dd4-877aa86e0e0b@web.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:48:20 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Hongfu Li <lihongfu@...inos.cn>, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
 Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dlm: use KMEM_CACHE() in dlm_memory_init()

> Using KMEM_CACHE() macro makes the code more concise and easy to read.

Can the three passed name strings matter still for the identification
of the created caches from this function implementation?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/fs/dlm/memory.c#L27
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/mm/slab_common.c#L362

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ