[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fsxowdpaeaxcnu7aewif6yqqk3jdgsjtksbznv2arnmmtiaq6@ibzf2qcel5lc>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:40:52 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] media: Fix the last set of coccinelle warnings
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 01:37:43PM GMT, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> With this set we are done with all the cocci warning/errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v5: Thanks Vikash
> - Remove patches already merged
> - Fix typos and remove hfi_resource_ocmem_requirement
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606-cocci-flexarray-v4-0-3379ee5eed28@chromium.org
>
Just for the clarfification: does the driver build without errors
if only a part of the patchset is applied? I have the feeling that first
patches introduce a build error which is fixed in a later patch. If
that's the case, it's a no-go.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists