[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiDSCtZWUx_RmZ8j3-x_LN_m76AzyrUUrUubCGt8kieLGvZfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:50:30 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>, "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] media: Fix the last set of coccinelle warnings
Hi
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 08:41, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 01:37:43PM GMT, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > With this set we are done with all the cocci warning/errors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5: Thanks Vikash
> > - Remove patches already merged
> > - Fix typos and remove hfi_resource_ocmem_requirement
> > - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606-cocci-flexarray-v4-0-3379ee5eed28@chromium.org
> >
>
> Just for the clarfification: does the driver build without errors
> if only a part of the patchset is applied? I have the feeling that first
> patches introduce a build error which is fixed in a later patch. If
> that's the case, it's a no-go.
I believe it should build without errors for every patch: It has
passed the bisectability test
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/users/ribalda/-/jobs/62071294
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists