| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1f02756f-a753-459b-8e8b-85fbbe5c5126@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:31:59 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: swap: mTHP swap allocator base on swap cluster
order
On 19/06/2024 10:20, Chris Li wrote:
> This is the short term solutiolns "swap cluster order" listed
> in my "Swap Abstraction" discussion slice 8 in the recent
> LSF/MM conference.
>
> When commit 845982eb264bc "mm: swap: allow storage of all mTHP
> orders" is introduced, it only allocates the mTHP swap entries
> from new empty cluster list. It has a fragmentation issue
> reported by Barry.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGsJ_4zAcJkuW016Cfi6wicRr8N9X+GJJhgMQdSMp+Ah+NSgNQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> The reason is that all the empty cluster has been exhausted while
> there are planty of free swap entries to in the cluster that is
> not 100% free.
>
> Remember the swap allocation order in the cluster.
> Keep track of the per order non full cluster list for later allocation.
>
> User impact: For users that allocate and free mix order mTHP swapping,
> It greatly improves the success rate of the mTHP swap allocation after the
> initial phase.
>
> Barry provides a test program to show the effect:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240615084714.37499-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
>
> Without:
> $ mthp-swapout
> Iteration 1: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 2: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 3: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 4: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 5: swpout inc: 110, swpout fallback inc: 117, Fallback percentage: 51.54%
> Iteration 6: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 230, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 7: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 229, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 8: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 223, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 9: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 224, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 10: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 216, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 11: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 212, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 12: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 224, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 13: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 214, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
>
> $ mthp-swapout -s
> Iteration 1: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 2: swpout inc: 227, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 3: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 4: swpout inc: 224, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 5: swpout inc: 33, swpout fallback inc: 197, Fallback percentage: 85.65%
> Iteration 6: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 229, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 7: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 223, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 8: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 219, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
> Iteration 9: swpout inc: 0, swpout fallback inc: 212, Fallback percentage: 100.00%
>
> With:
> $ mthp-swapout
> Iteration 1: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 2: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 3: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 4: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 5: swpout inc: 227, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 6: swpout inc: 230, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> ...
> Iteration 94: swpout inc: 224, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 95: swpout inc: 221, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 96: swpout inc: 229, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 97: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 98: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 99: swpout inc: 223, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 100: swpout inc: 224, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
>
> $ mthp-swapout -s
> Iteration 1: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 2: swpout inc: 227, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 3: swpout inc: 222, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 4: swpout inc: 224, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 5: swpout inc: 230, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 6: swpout inc: 229, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 7: swpout inc: 223, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 8: swpout inc: 219, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> ...
> Iteration 94: swpout inc: 223, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 95: swpout inc: 212, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 96: swpout inc: 220, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 97: swpout inc: 220, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 98: swpout inc: 216, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 99: swpout inc: 223, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
> Iteration 100: swpout inc: 225, swpout fallback inc: 0, Fallback percentage: 0.00%
Excellent!
>
> Reported-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Using V1 as base.
> - Rename "next" to "list" for the list field, suggested by Ying.
> - Update comment for the locking rules for cluster fields and list,
> suggested by Ying.
> - Allocate from the nonfull list before attempting free list, suggested
> by Kairui.
Sorry I didn't follow this original conversation. But the original intent of
having a per-cpu current cluster was to prevent interleving pages from multiple
processes and therefore optimize IO. See commit ebc2a1a69111 ("swap: make
cluster allocation per-cpu"). I wonder if this change could lead to a swap
performance regression in the common order-0 case?
Thanks,
Ryan
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240614-swap-allocator-v2-0-2a513b4a7f2f@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Abandoned.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-swap-allocator-v1-0-47861b423b26@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Chris Li (2):
> mm: swap: swap cluster switch to double link list
> mm: swap: mTHP allocate swap entries from nonfull list
>
> include/linux/swap.h | 30 +++----
> mm/swapfile.c | 248 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 19b8422c5bd56fb5e7085995801c6543a98bda1f
> change-id: 20240523-swap-allocator-1534c480ece4
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists