linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/hbl: add habanalabs RDMA driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e648659-cf81-4b06-9015-8a5345e34ed9@habana.ai>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:34:40 +0000
From: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky
	<leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "ogabbay@...nel.org" <ogabbay@...nel.org>,
        Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@...ana.ai>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/hbl: add habanalabs RDMA driver

On 6/18/24 19:01, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 6/18/24 13:08, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>> On 6/17/24 22:04, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from leon@...nel.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:43:49PM +0000, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>>>> On 6/13/24 22:18, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from leon@...nel.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 11:22:04AM +0300, Omer Shpigelman wrote:
>>>>>> Add an RDMA driver of Gaudi ASICs family for AI scaling.
>>>>>> The driver itself is agnostic to the ASIC in action, it operates according
>>>>>> to the capabilities that were passed on device initialization.
>>>>>> The device is initialized by the hbl_cn driver via auxiliary bus.
>>>>>> The driver also supports QP resource tracking and port/device HW counters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Abhilash K V <kvabhilash@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhilash K V <kvabhilash@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Andrey Agranovich <aagranovich@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Agranovich <aagranovich@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Bharat Jauhari <bjauhari@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Jauhari <bjauhari@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: David Meriin <dmeriin@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Meriin <dmeriin@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Sagiv Ozeri <sozeri@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sagiv Ozeri <sozeri@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@...ana.ai>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zvika Yehudai <zyehudai@...ana.ai>
>>>>>
>>>>> I afraid that you misinterpreted the "Co-developed-by" tag. All these
>>>>> people are probably touch the code and not actually sit together at
>>>>> the same room and write the code together. So, please remove the
>>>>> extensive "Co-developed-by" tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not full review yet, but simple pass-by-comments.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually except of two, all of the mentioned persons sat in the same room
>>>> and developed the code together.
>>>> The remaining two are located on a different site (but also together).
>>>> Isn't that what "Co-developed-by" tag for?
>>>> I wanted to give them credit for writing the code but I can remove if it's
>>>> not common.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by will be enough to give them credit.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, good enough.
>>
> 
> I would say that a lone sign-off give a little of credit compared to the
> co-developed-by tag. OTOH the list here is unusually long. What makes it
> even more tricky to evaluate is the fact that there is a lot of code ;)
> 
> So, I would suggest to re-evaluate this on your next (trimmed down)
> revisions.

You are right about the smaller credit Signed-off-by gives compared to
Co-developed-by, but yeah, the list is unusually long.
I'll try to split it to smaller patches and give credit only to the
specific persons involved.