[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbcfb64a-e5c2-41a7-8847-227d4f6872de@web.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:13:18 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, lkp@...el.com,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
>> Would you dare to transform the remaining goto chain into further applications
>> of scope-based resource management?
>
> We discussed this after v6 or v7, DRM/DMABUF maintainers were not keen
> on doing that *just yet*.
* Would you like to add any links for corresponding development discussions?
* Will the desire grow for further collateral evolution according to
affected software components?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists