[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d452ecc4fc703a1f98aa4f243c6ded7fbfe54b0e.camel@crapouillou.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:09:29 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, lkp@...el.com, Nuno
Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Christian
König <christian.koenig@....com>, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Sumit Semwal
<sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap
<rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v11 3/7] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
Hi Markus,
Le mercredi 19 juin 2024 à 12:03 +0200, Markus Elfring a écrit :
> …
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > > > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c:1715:3: error: cannot jump
> > > > from this goto statement to its label
> > 1715 | goto err_dmabuf_unmap_attachment;
> …
>
> Would you dare to transform the remaining goto chain into further
> applications
> of scope-based resource management?
We discussed this after v6 or v7, DRM/DMABUF maintainers were not keen
on doing that *just yet*.
Cheers,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists