lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:31:51 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, neil.armstrong@...aro.org
Cc: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio
 <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Add video and camera
 clock controllers

Hi Dmitry,

On 6/18/24 17:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 02:17:23PM GMT, neil.armstrong@...aro.org wrote:
>> On 02/06/2024 13:44, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>>> Add device nodes for video and camera clock controllers on Qualcomm
>>> SM8650 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>>
>> And add the missing required-opps for the clock controllers like
>> dispcc.
> 
> Unless the opps is required because cmd-db has lower level than
> required for the functioning of the device, there should be no need to
> add the required-opps.
> 

this is totally fine, but then 'required-opps' property shall be removed
from the list of required properties in device tree bindings description.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ