linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI /amba: Fix meaningless code for amba_register_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240619123308.ti54nduhj6cayfvl@bogus>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:33:08 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Youwan Wang <youwan@...china.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI /amba: Fix meaningless code for
 amba_register_dummy_clk()

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 07:58:45PM +0800, Youwan Wang wrote:
> Defining `amba_dummy_clk` as static is meaningless.
> 
> The amba_register_dummy_clk() function is static and
> is called during initialization. I think 'amba_dummy_clk'
> should be NULL each time when initializing
>

Also I missed to read the commit message, please update it as follows:

"
ACPI / amba: Drop unnecessary check for registered amba_dummy_clk

amba_register_dummy_clk() is called only once from acpi_amba_init()
and acpi_amba_init() itself is called once during the initialisation.
amba_dummy_clk cann't be initialised before this in any other code
path and hence the check for already registered amba_dummy_clk is
not necessary. Drop the same.
"

Also few other things to note:
1. You missed to add my Acked-by which I gave to your v2
2. This is v3 and new reviewers of this patch have absolutely no idea
   what got changed from v1->v2->v3. It is always good to add change log
   across versions
3. I asked you to add ARM64 maintainers as we would request them to pick
   this up via ARM64 tree.
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

--
Regards,
Sudeep