linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) instead of TIM_DIER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ip5aysvcuchc6q6sikghcz7vjn6zvih5r3amkvp7n7xpvncbhh@jdq5lkckeoej>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:56:15 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>, 
	William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thorsten Scherer <T.Scherer@...elmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)
 instead of TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)

Hello Lee,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:38:38PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Which patches need to be in the pull-request and which can be hoovered
> up by their associated subsystems?

The dependencies are as follows:

	#1 <- #2 <- #3 <- #4
	       ^
	      #5

So the practical options are (in the order of my not very strong preference):

 - Immutable branch with #1 - #4 (assuming William is ok to let you
   merge #3), and then I can add #5 (and further work on the pwm-stm32
   driver that I'm currently working on). Maybe William even doesn't
   need to pull; I didn't check.

 - Immutable branch with only #1 and #2. Then William can pull and add
   #3 and I can pull and add #5. #4 can be applied later then.
   (I can remind about #4 in the next cycle.)

 - Immutable branch with #1 - #5
   (Reminder: In that case please fixup the pwm patch's short log with
   s/-/: /)
   I would add this for sure to the pwm tree. I didn't even try to check
   if it's needed for mfd and/or counter. So if you don't need it, I
   volunteer to create that branch, but if you want to do it, that's
   just fine, too.

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)