lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:28:58 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 09:39:00AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> When a resource table is loaded by an external entity such as U-boot or
> OP-TEE, we do not necessary get the device address(da) but the physical

s/necessary/necessarily

> address(pa).
> This helper performs similar translation than the rproc_da_to_va()
> but based on a physical address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  3 ++
>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index f276956f2c5c..3fdec0336fd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,77 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iomem)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_da_to_va);
>  
> +/**
> + * rproc_pa_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a physical address of a remoteproc
> + * memory
> + *
> + * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
> + * @pa: remoteproc physical address
> + * @len: length of the memory region @pa is pointing to
> + * @is_iomem: optional pointer filled in to indicate if @da is iomapped memory
> + *
> + * Some remote processors will ask us to allocate them physically contiguous
> + * memory regions (which we call "carveouts"), and map them to specific
> + * device addresses (which are hardcoded in the firmware). They may also have
> + * dedicated memory regions internal to the processors, and use them either
> + * exclusively or alongside carveouts.
> + *
> + * They may then ask us to copy objects into specific addresses (e.g.
> + * code/data sections) or expose us certain symbols in other device address
> + * (e.g. their trace buffer).
> + *
> + * This function is a helper function with which we can go over the allocated
> + * carveouts and translate specific physical addresses to kernel virtual addresses
> + * so we can access the referenced memory. This function also allows to perform
> + * translations on the internal remoteproc memory regions through a platform
> + * implementation specific pa_to_va ops, if present.
> + *
> + * Note: phys_to_virt(iommu_iova_to_phys(rproc->domain, da)) will work too,
> + * but only on kernel direct mapped RAM memory. Instead, we're just using
> + * here the output of the DMA API for the carveouts, which should be more
> + * correct.

No point in copying all this.  Just say that it does the same thing as
rproc_da_to_va(), but with the PA address.

> + *
> + * Return: a valid kernel address on success or NULL on failure
> + */
> +void *rproc_pa_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, phys_addr_t pa, size_t len, bool *is_iomem)
> +{
> +	struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
> +
> +	if (rproc->ops->da_to_va) {

This is really wrong.

> +		ptr = rproc->ops->pa_to_va(rproc, pa, len);
> +		if (ptr)
> +			goto out;
> +	}

There is no current customer for ops::pa_to_va() so please remove.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(carveout, &rproc->carveouts, node) {
> +		int offset = pa - carveout->dma;
> +
> +		/*  Verify that carveout is allocated */
> +		if (!carveout->va)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* try next carveout if da is too small */
> +		if (offset < 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* try next carveout if da is too large */
> +		if (offset + len > carveout->len)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ptr = carveout->va + offset;
> +
> +		if (is_iomem)
> +			*is_iomem = carveout->is_iomem;
> +
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	return ptr;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_pa_to_va);
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_find_carveout_by_name() - lookup the carveout region by a name
>   * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
> @@ -724,8 +795,7 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	 * firmware was compiled with.
>  	 *
>  	 * In this case, we must use the IOMMU API directly and map
> -	 * the memory to the device address as expected by the remote
> -	 * processor.
> +	 * the memory to the device address as etable
>  	 *
>  	 * Obviously such remote processor devices should not be configured
>  	 * to use the iommu-based DMA API: we expect 'dma' to contain the
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index b4795698d8c2..28aa62a3b505 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>   * @detach:	detach from a device, leaving it powered up
>   * @kick:	kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
>   * @da_to_va:	optional platform hook to perform address translations
> + * @pa_to_va:	optional platform hook to perform address translations
>   * @parse_fw:	parse firmware to extract information (e.g. resource table)
>   * @handle_rsc:	optional platform hook to handle vendor resources. Should return
>   *		RSC_HANDLED if resource was handled, RSC_IGNORED if not handled
> @@ -391,6 +392,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
>  	int (*detach)(struct rproc *rproc);
>  	void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>  	void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iomem);
> +	void * (*pa_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, phys_addr_t da, size_t len);
>  	int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>  	int (*handle_rsc)(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc,
>  			  int offset, int avail);
> @@ -690,6 +692,7 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
>  int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
>  void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
>  void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool *is_iomem);
> +void *rproc_pa_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, phys_addr_t pa, size_t len, bool *is_iomem);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_coredump.c */
>  void rproc_coredump_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ