[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnS-y94qwA1Wmlo8@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:44:11 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Yusong Gao <a869920004@...il.com>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Add log information for loading module
failures
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:30:37AM +0000, Yusong Gao wrote:
> Add log information in kernel-space when loading module failures.
> Try to load the unsigned module and the module with bad signature
> when set 1 to /sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce.
>
> Unsigned module case:
> (linux) insmod unsigned.ko
> [ 18.714661] Loading of unsigned module is rejected
> insmod: can't insert 'unsigned.ko': Key was rejected by service
> (linux)
>
> Bad signature module case:
> (linux) insmod bad_signature.ko
> insmod: can't insert 'bad_signature.ko': Key was rejected by service
> (linux)
>
> There have different logging behavior the bad signature case only log
> in user-space, add log info for fatal errors in module_sig_check().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yusong Gao <a869920004@...il.com>
> ---
> V2: Change print level from notice to debug.
> ---
> kernel/module/signing.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module/signing.c b/kernel/module/signing.c
> index a2ff4242e623..b0c7b30e4d89 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/signing.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/signing.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> * unparseable signatures, and signature check failures --
> * even if signatures aren't required.
> */
> + pr_debug("Loading module failed (errno=%d)\n", -err);
There are so many debug message, this doesn't help explain why, ie, tha
this is a signature issue.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists