lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 23:12:52 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
 Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
 Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng
 <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
 Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
 Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Alice Ryhl
 <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
 rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: rust-analyzer target: better error handling and
 comments

On 6/19/24 5:25 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 2:49 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>>      Rust is not available
> 
> Maybe we should use the `***` notation that is used elsewhere?

What exactly did you have in mind for how that should look? The
"make rustavailable" target has some leading *** and some bare
statements, so I'm not quite sure exactly how to lay it out:

$ make rustavailable
***
*** Rust bindings generator 'bindgen' is too new. This may or may not work.
***   Your version:     0.69.4
***   Expected version: 0.65.1
***
***
*** Please see Documentation/rust/quick-start.rst for details
*** on how to set up the Rust support.
***
Rust is available!



> 
>> 2) As long as I'm there, also add some documentation about what
>> rust-analyzer provides.
> 
> Perhaps this could go in a separate patch.

Sure, I'll split it out if you all prefer.

> 
> But those are nits -- if Masahiro is OK with this approach:
> 
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> 
> Happy to take it too.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ