[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240620115305.GBZnQYIex1mnXxoG-8@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:53:05 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/resctrl: Don't try to free nonexistent
RMIDs
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:36:43PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> I guess my issue is that the "Massage commit message" seems to document
> a criticism that the author was careless, didn't follow a rule, or that
> the commit message was defective in some way, with the author having no
> right of reply (at least, not recorded in the git history).
Not necessarily - that's what you said. I massage commit messages because they
need some touch ups sometimes.
In your case I rewrote the sentence with "we" because "we" is ambiguous in
commit messages. I also broke up this biggish paragraph into smaller chunks to
make it more readable.
> I may just be being too touchy.
>
> Anyway, thanks for picking up the patch -- I'm not trying to make extra
> work for anyone.
I look at it this way: I don't always agree with other maintainers' choices
either but this is the reality: every maintainer has their own
requirements/views/etc on how the code and commit messages are going to look,
yadda yadda. And to some extent that's their prerogative.
But we have a *lot* *bigger* fish to fry so I'm going to stop debating here as
everything was already said.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists