[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnRAEzRQpfm7yHHc@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:43:31 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH fixes 1/4] MIPS: mipsmtregs: Fix target register for MFTC0
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:37:48PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在2024年6月19日六月 下午12:32,Jiaxun Yang写道:
> > 在2024年6月16日六月 下午2:25,Jiaxun Yang写道:
> >> Target register of mftc0 should be __res instead of $1, this is
> >> a leftover from old .insn code.
> >>
> >> Fixes: dd6d29a61489 ("MIPS: Implement microMIPS MT ASE helpers")
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I saw you sent mips-fixes_6.10_1 pull request but this series is
> > not included in that PR while one of my later patch is included.
> >
> > If you think the whole series is not fit for fixes tree then please
> > at least let this series go through fixes tree. There are many MT
> ^ Sorry I meant patch.
sorry I've missed the fixes tag. As the rest looks like a lot of re-shuffling
I'd prefer to just place the first patch to mips-fixes and the rest to
mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists