linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf trace: Add test for enum augmentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:15:24 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf trace: Add test for enum augmentation

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 9:43 AM Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Namhyung,
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 12:07 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Howard,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 04:20:42PM +0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > > Check for vmlinux's existence in sysfs as prerequisite.
> > >
> > > Add landlock_add_rule.c workload. Trace landlock_add_rule syscall to see
> > > if the output is desirable.
> >
> > Do you expect to add more things to the landlock workload?  I think we
> > could simply call it landlock.c and probably do other things according
> > to the argument, if needed (e.g. landlock add).
>
> Shortening the name is good, I'll change it, thanks. I think
> landlock_add_rule is the only syscall that we need currently, for it
> contains the only enum argument of all the syscalls. I'll look into
> how we can use these arguments, thank you.

If you don't plan to add something, let's call it landlock.c and forget
about the argument handling for now. :)

But please add a comment in the file that it's just to test BPF
handling of enum arguments.

Thanks,
Namhyung