[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<BY3PR18MB4737007F602F43294EFAF36EC6C92@BY3PR18MB4737.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:53:51 +0000
From: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
To: WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com"
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com"
<joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"guanwentao@...ontech.com"
<guanwentao@...ontech.com>,
Wang Zhimin <wangzhimin1179@...tium.com.cn>,
Li
Wencheng <liwencheng@...tium.com.cn>,
Chen Baozi <chenbaozi@...tium.com.cn>,
Wang Yinfeng <wangyinfeng@...tium.com.cn>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Add a barrier to make sure all access
coherent
>Besides, increase the ring buffer size to avoid buffer overflow.
>
> */
> #define DMA_MIN_TX_SIZE 64
> #define DMA_MAX_TX_SIZE 1024
>-#define DMA_DEFAULT_TX_SIZE 512
>+#define DMA_DEFAULT_TX_SIZE 1024
> #define DMA_MIN_RX_SIZE 64
> #define DMA_MAX_RX_SIZE 1024
>-#define DMA_DEFAULT_RX_SIZE 512
>+#define DMA_DEFAULT_RX_SIZE 1024
> #define STMMAC_GET_ENTRY(x, size) ((x + 1) & (size - 1))
>
If this is a fix, please add a fixes tag.
/* Prefetch the next RX descriptor */
rx_q->cur_rx = STMMAC_GET_ENTRY(rx_q->cur_rx,
priv->dma_conf.dma_rx_size);
Also do please elaborate buffer overflow problem.
Is this ' DMA_DEFAULT_RX_SIZE ' descriptor size or size of full descriptor ring ?
Thanks,
Sunil.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists