linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: convert core clocks to clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:05:08 -0700
From: William McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
	Roy Luo <royluo@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: convert core clocks to
 clk_bulk

On 06/17/2024, André Draszik wrote:
> Using the clk_bulk APIs, the clock handling for the core clocks becomes
> much simpler. No need to check any flags whether or not certain clocks
> exist or not. Further, we can drop the various handles to the
> individual clocks in the driver data and instead simply treat them all
> as one thing.
> 
> So far, this driver assumes that all platforms have a clock "ref". It
> also assumes that the clocks "phy_pipe", "phy_utmi", and "itp" exist if
> the platform data "has_common_clk_gate" is set to true. It then goes
> and individually tries to acquire and enable and disable all the
> individual clocks one by one. Rather than relying on these implicit
> clocks and open-coding the clock handling, we can just explicitly spell
> out the clock names in the different device data and use that
> information to populate clk_bulk_data, allowing us to use the clk_bulk
> APIs for managing the clocks.
> 
> As a side-effect, this change highlighted the fact that
> exynos5_usbdrd_phy_power_on() forgot to check the result of the clock
> enable calls. Using the clk_bulk APIs, the compiler now warns when
> return values are not checked - therefore add the necessary check
> instead of silently ignoring failures and continuing as if all is OK
> when it isn't.
> 
> For consistency, also change a related dev_err() to dev_err_probe() in
> exynos5_usbdrd_phy_clk_handle() to get consistent error message
> formatting.
> 
> Finally, exynos5_usbdrd_phy_clk_handle() prints an error message in all
> cases as necessary (except for -ENOMEM). There is no need to print
> another message in its caller (the probe() function), and printing
> errors during OOM conditions is usually discouraged. Drop the
> duplicated message in exynos5_usbdrd_phy_probe().
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>

Tested-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>

[...]

Thanks,
Will