[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171925138897.1926472.5821855651002898264.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:50:17 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf arm: Workaround ARM PMUs cpu maps having offline cpus
On Thu, 06 Jun 2024 23:53:43 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When PMUs have a cpu map in the 'cpus' or 'cpumask' file, perf will
> try to open events on those CPUs. ARM doesn't remove offline CPUs
> meaning taking a CPU offline will cause perf commands to fail unless a
> CPU map is passed on the command line.
>
> More context in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240603092812.46616-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists