[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171926144609.373838.11321058105570847753.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:37:38 -0600
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: Explain lack of child dependency in
simple-mfd
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:46:00 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Common mistake of usage of 'simple-mfd' compatible is a dependency of
> children on resources acquired and managed by the parent, e.g. clocks.
> Extend the simple-mfd documentation to cover this case.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Rephrase the paragraph, as discussed with Lee.
> 2. Add Rb tag.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists