[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171941757920.2534629.6693868138282442038.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:59:39 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: Explain lack of child
dependency in simple-mfd
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:46:00 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Common mistake of usage of 'simple-mfd' compatible is a dependency of
> children on resources acquired and managed by the parent, e.g. clocks.
> Extend the simple-mfd documentation to cover this case.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: mfd: Explain lack of child dependency in simple-mfd
commit: b448048dd540fa5b0176dc0bb07309887485da59
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists