linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more places

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240624114501.GK7611@linux-l9pv.suse>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:45:01 +0800
From: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Chun-Yi Lee <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>, Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more
 places

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:28:54PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Please reconsider the version identification in this patch subject once more.
> >>
> >>
> >> …
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> v2:
> >>> - Improve patch description
> >> …
> >>
> >> How many patch variations were discussed and reviewed in the meantime?
> >>
> >
> > Only v2. I sent v2 patch again because nobody response my code in patch.
> > But I still want to grap comments for my code.
> 
> How does such a feedback fit to my previous patch review?
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/e8331545-d261-44af-b500-93b90d77d8b7@web.de/
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/5/14/551
>

I want to collect comment of my code in patch then send next version.

Joey Lee