[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMZU=T6J5OBpELxB=ZqOnrkou2iRG7zaqoNy7bCGgH9hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:09:02 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: simplify data_race() macro
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 16:43, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 13:49, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Use auto type deduction and comma expression to decrease macro expansion
> > > size.
> > >
> > > __unqual_scalar_typeof() is quite wordy macro by itself.
> > >
> > > "expr" can be arbitrary complex so not expanding it twice is good.
> > > Should be faster too because type is deduced only once
> > > from the initializer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> >
> > Thanks for cleaning up. That code certainly predates the availability
> > of __auto_type. Although if I recall correctly, __unqual_scalar_typeof
> > became the first user of _Generic (the first C11 keyword we used in
> > the kernel?), but we used some ifdef to still support ancient
> > compilers initially (that definitely also didn't have __auto_type).
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> >
> > Which tree is this for?
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > include/linux/compiler.h | 5 +----
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> > > @@ -200,10 +200,7 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
> > > */
> > > #define data_race(expr) \
> > > ({ \
> > > - __unqual_scalar_typeof(({ expr; })) __v = ({ \
> > > - __kcsan_disable_current(); \
> > > - expr; \
> > > - }); \
> > > + __auto_type __v = (__kcsan_disable_current(), expr); \
> > > __kcsan_enable_current(); \
> > > __v; \
> > > })
>
> I just realized, comma expression should not be necesary.
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement prohibited simple
>
> ({
> __kcsan_disable_current
> auto v = (expr);
> __kcsan_enable_current
> v;
> })
Even better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists