linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/vmware: fix panic in vmware_hypercall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:51:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
	Alex James <alex.james@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/vmware: fix panic in vmware_hypercall_slow()

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:45:50AM -0700, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
> My test environment was screwed up during the last version of the patchset.
> I was using a kernel which was built previously and didn't pay attention to
> commit hash suffix in `uname -r`.
> Human mistake, apologize for that.

Ok, no worries, happens.

> Alex found it while doing TDX testing on x86/vmware on tip.
> 
> Do you want me to resubmit the patchset to do not brake a git bisect?

Nah, I'll fold it into the broken patch and rebase.

Btw, pls do me a favor and do not top-post but put your reply underneath the
quoted text, like we all do.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette