[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f855f6ec-f0f7-467a-9823-d19706574408@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:51:56 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
gustavoars@...nel.org, henryc.chen@...iatek.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...labora.com, wenst@...omium.org, amergnat@...libre.com,
djakov@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] MediaTek DVFSRC Bus Bandwidth and Regulator knobs
Il 25/06/24 14:50, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:58:57PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 25/06/24 12:25, Mark Brown ha scritto:
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>
>>>> The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding
>>>> dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195
>>>> does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present
>>>> or the validation obviously fails.
>
>>> I can't tell what you want from me here.
>
>> I'm asking you to pick the regulator patches :-)
>
>> dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators
>> regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c
>> regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver
>
> Is there no interdependency with the rest of the series? There was in
> some earlier version at least I think. If I reviewed the patches it's
> because I wasn't expecting to apply them.
The interdependency is for soc/mediatek commits, which depend on:
- Interconnect commits (which Georgi picked already); and
- Regulator commits
And... you reviewed the patch in the previous merge window :-)
Cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists