lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:50:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	matthias.bgg@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	gustavoars@...nel.org, henryc.chen@...iatek.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
	wenst@...omium.org, amergnat@...libre.com, djakov@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] MediaTek DVFSRC Bus Bandwidth and Regulator knobs

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:58:57PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 25/06/24 12:25, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32:30AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

> > > The main issue here is that the main soc/mediatek dvfsrc binding
> > > dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: Add DVFSRC bindings for MT8183 and MT8195
> > > does use the others, so I can't pick this one without the others being present
> > > or the validation obviously fails.

> > I can't tell what you want from me here.

> I'm asking you to pick the regulator patches :-)

>    dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for MediaTek DVFSRC Regulators
>    regulator: Remove mtk-dvfsrc-regulator.c
>    regulator: Add refactored mtk-dvfsrc-regulator driver

Is there no interdependency with the rest of the series?  There was in
some earlier version at least I think.  If I reviewed the patches it's
because I wasn't expecting to apply them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ