linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ff2aaf0d-5456-43d1-af52-78986b3401f9@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:50:25 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
 Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for
 ast udc

>>> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
>>> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
>>
>> Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94
>
> Markus, please stop reviewing USB patches.  This is not helpful at all,
> and causes new developers extra work for no reason at all.

How does this feedback fit to the linked information source?

Regards,
Markus